Transcript
WEBVTT
00:00:03.708 --> 00:00:06.674
Court reporters hold one of the most important roles in the justice system.
00:00:06.674 --> 00:00:13.529
We're entrusted with the official records of the courts and we also have to run our own businesses, which is not something most of us were prepared for.
00:00:13.529 --> 00:00:22.992
I'm Bryn Seymour, freelance court reporter and life coach, and I invite you to join the discussion about the problems we face and the solutions we create on the unique journey of a stenographer.
00:00:22.992 --> 00:00:26.350
Welcome to the Entrepreneurial Court Reporter Podcast.
00:00:31.981 --> 00:00:34.747
Do you use Notion to manage your life?
00:00:34.747 --> 00:00:39.063
Because you're a CEO, you have many projects you're an advocate, yes, yes.
00:00:39.222 --> 00:00:42.228
So yes, I love Notion, I use Notion.
00:00:42.228 --> 00:00:59.368
I made a scoping workflow for myself on Notion that I use when I'm scoping and proofreading, and then I also use reminders and calendar, and then I also realized that for my brain, some things I just need to like I just need a pen and paper.
00:00:59.368 --> 00:01:19.614
So what I do is I will normally take notes over the course of three to four days and then I'll have my personal assistant take all those notes and turn them into reports that are then uploaded into the different systems that I use, which could be Notion, it could be ChatGPT, it could be Cloudai, like all the software tools that I use to like be able to get all these things done.
00:01:20.000 --> 00:01:21.647
So yeah, I love Notion.
00:01:21.647 --> 00:01:23.805
I just started using it too.
00:01:23.805 --> 00:01:25.411
It's amazing.
00:01:25.411 --> 00:01:28.566
I think it's great for our ADHD brains.
00:01:28.566 --> 00:01:29.888
It is, it is.
00:01:30.108 --> 00:01:31.051
It's all in one.
00:01:31.051 --> 00:01:37.561
All in one it is, and like I don't know why, I just love the inner, like the layout of it just works for me.
00:01:37.561 --> 00:01:40.009
Because there's so many tools, it's overwhelming.
00:01:40.009 --> 00:02:02.911
But with Notion, I like how my embedded links look like I literally have a pilates five minute stretch video embedded into my scoping workflow and so you don't have to go anywhere else exactly because I don't know about you, but if I leave that software, no telling when I'm coming back.
00:02:03.070 --> 00:02:16.227
You know three monitors, and on my left monitor is notion and on my center monitor is you know, eclipse or case catalyst, whichever one I'm using for the day, and everything is there.
00:02:16.227 --> 00:02:17.590
My Pomodoro method is there.
00:02:17.590 --> 00:02:31.830
So when the timer goes off I just click my video and I stretch every five minutes and then I also have like a little yeah, do you have a timer set to automatically go off at the same time every day?
00:02:33.281 --> 00:02:38.832
So the Pomodoro method is how I, if you want to call it hack, how I hack scoping.
00:02:38.832 --> 00:02:48.173
So it allows you to work for four 25 minute cycles and in between those 25 minutes you take a five minute break.
00:02:48.173 --> 00:02:55.014
And on the fourth cycle you take a 15 minute break and I use a Pomodoro method not just for scoping.
00:02:55.014 --> 00:02:57.794
So on my third 25 minute cycle, that's when I do my research.
00:02:57.794 --> 00:03:13.465
I think I said earlier that I recommend doing research every hour and a half.
00:03:13.465 --> 00:03:15.875
I stick to that because of the Pomodoro method.
00:03:15.875 --> 00:03:19.306
So on that third 25 minute cycle, I'm going to research things.
00:03:19.306 --> 00:03:27.104
I'm going to open up Morrison's or go on Margie's blog and, like, really dig into something that I was kind of hanging in my mind while I was scoping or proofing.
00:03:28.948 --> 00:03:47.211
I'm going to check emails, things like that For research, when you say you take every hour and a half to do that, like, as we're working we come across things that we need to research, but instead of doing it on the spot, you'll kind of make a note of it and then do it all at once, exactly, exactly, so like if I'm on case catalyst.
00:03:47.270 --> 00:03:48.633
I'll put a scan stop there.
00:03:48.633 --> 00:03:59.625
I have clipboard history turned on on my on in windows so I can hit control C up to 25 times, you know, before it runs out.
00:03:59.625 --> 00:04:12.688
So then when I press windows and the letter V, that brings up everything that I hit control C for for during that 25-minute cycle and that's what I research Interesting, so I don't break my concentration.
00:04:12.688 --> 00:04:14.235
I didn't know you could do that.
00:04:14.235 --> 00:04:14.777
Wow, it's wonderful.
00:04:15.259 --> 00:04:18.399
Yeah, because research leads down many rabbit holes sometimes.
00:04:18.439 --> 00:04:36.466
Yeah, suddenly, I'm looking at Express's sale because I haven't been able to go shopping like a normal human being and I love looking at the promotions for Express and Ann Taylor, and I will just find myself scrolling through, you know, the new dresses that Ann Taylor has out while I'm trying to research something Right.
00:04:36.687 --> 00:04:38.132
It's so crazy Like I don't.
00:04:38.132 --> 00:04:42.826
I don't know how I end up on certain topics when I'm researching and it just doesn't.
00:04:42.826 --> 00:04:53.904
But I guess if you, if you save it all for one batch, it kind of works prevents you from going down those rabbit holes, because you have a list of things you need to get through.
00:04:54.346 --> 00:04:58.362
Yes, but I didn't know you could do that copy and paste thing with multiple.
00:04:58.382 --> 00:04:58.783
Yeah.
00:04:58.783 --> 00:05:12.600
So yeah, if you go into your clipboard settings in windows, if you just type in clipboard settings, there's a button that is grayed out normally, but if you check it it will switch to blue and it's called clipboard history.
00:05:12.600 --> 00:05:35.613
So once you have that turned on, anything, you press ctrl c for it will save it in a list and you can actually so when I use a word list, I love it for my word list because I can actually put my cursor in a cell, like on Google Sheets, if I use Google Sheets for my word list, and then I can actually paste directly from that list, one at a time.
00:05:35.613 --> 00:05:49.548
So if I research a name and I confirm that the way it is is spelled correctly, then I can put that in my confirmed list of spellings without touching my mouse, and my goal when I scope is I don't want to touch my mouse at all.
00:05:49.567 --> 00:05:53.065
Yeah, that reminds me of a question I had about scoping.
00:05:53.065 --> 00:05:56.963
Do yours or do you and your scope is, I guess, build on the dictionary of the court reporter.
00:05:56.963 --> 00:06:01.721
One of the things that the scope is that I had hired as my personal transcript manager.
00:06:01.721 --> 00:06:09.369
That was one of the things that I kind of always wanted her to do but never really implemented it, because I wanted to build my dictionary.
00:06:09.369 --> 00:06:14.879
And that's the one thing about not scoping your own work is that you're not really like actively building your dictionary.
00:06:14.879 --> 00:06:17.105
But how does that?
00:06:17.365 --> 00:06:17.646
work.
00:06:17.646 --> 00:06:20.932
Yeah, so I do that if a court reporter wants it.
00:06:20.932 --> 00:06:35.425
Most of the court reporters I work with don't want things added to their dictionary the way that I may see it right because they write it that way or it was a one-off or whatever the case may be if we want to.
00:06:35.706 --> 00:06:37.490
You know, we always want to improve our dictionaries.
00:06:37.490 --> 00:06:42.701
So if you came across something that wasn't in there in the court reporter's dictionary, do you make a list of it, or I guess?
00:06:42.781 --> 00:06:46.471
yes, I'll make the list and yes, I'll make a list and yeah, so like, for instance, what was it?
00:06:46.471 --> 00:06:55.869
I saw Someone was trying to okay, the court reporter was trying to write safekeeping and it kept coming out as safe COVID-19.
00:06:55.869 --> 00:06:56.651
I don't know how.
00:06:56.651 --> 00:06:59.781
So what?
00:06:59.781 --> 00:07:02.666
So I, that's something that I'll email about.
00:07:02.666 --> 00:07:07.214
Like, hey, whenever you try to write safekeeping, you get safe COVID-19.
00:07:07.214 --> 00:07:11.571
Before I you know change this, how do you want it?
00:07:11.571 --> 00:07:15.802
And normally when I ask, they'll be like oh, I know what I did, I'll fix it.
00:07:15.802 --> 00:07:17.148
It's nothing that you can really do.
00:07:17.148 --> 00:07:19.048
It's a decision I'm going to have to make later.
00:07:19.048 --> 00:07:23.702
Yeah, so I will do that and so I will do that.
00:07:23.702 --> 00:07:30.047
But, like I said, most of the time, the court reporters that I have currently that I work with currently, they don't want me to global anything.
00:07:30.107 --> 00:07:35.531
But if a court reporter did want me to add something to their job dictionary, absolutely you know and send it back.
00:07:35.531 --> 00:07:40.634
What I thought you were going to ask me is if the Scopus use the.
00:07:40.634 --> 00:07:42.115
I'm sorry, what system are you on?
00:07:42.115 --> 00:07:44.656
Are you on Case Catalyst or yeah, I'm on Case Cat.
00:07:44.656 --> 00:07:54.857
Okay, so the way I teach, I teach Scopus to use the Cat4KBD exclusively.
00:07:54.857 --> 00:07:58.959
What the?
00:07:58.959 --> 00:08:05.608
So have you ever hit the backslash by mistake and you start hitting buttons and your cursor is going all over the place and you don't know why, when you're hitting keys normally oh yeah, I think I've, and it's like sticky keys, right.
00:08:06.790 --> 00:08:08.031
That's how it kind of behaves.
00:08:08.031 --> 00:08:08.992
Yes, yes.
00:08:09.694 --> 00:08:12.641
So yeah, that's annoying and kind of scary when that happens?
00:08:12.802 --> 00:08:15.427
Yes, it is, but we've turned it into a superpower.
00:08:15.427 --> 00:08:20.723
So the reason that we use that is because that allows you to not touch your mouse.
00:08:20.723 --> 00:08:27.134
So all of the keys turn into another command and it's great.
00:08:27.134 --> 00:08:37.677
So like if you were to look at your keyboard I J, k, l is the arrow pad, so I goes up a line, k goes down a line, j goes left one word, l goes right one word.
00:08:37.677 --> 00:08:44.562
So if you're a touch typist and you keep your hands on home row, you can fly.
00:08:44.562 --> 00:08:48.029
So all of the letters.
00:08:48.110 --> 00:08:51.317
The QWERTY keyboard is no more behaving as a QWERTY keyboard.
00:08:51.317 --> 00:08:55.859
So when you actually want to type something, we press the letter N, which is a shortcut to open up the insert box, and then you type whatever you want to type and press enter.
00:08:55.859 --> 00:09:00.491
Press the letter N, which is a shortcut to open up the insert box, and then you type whatever you want to type and press enter.
00:09:00.491 --> 00:09:13.557
It pops it in that area and then you can keep using your shortcut keys to cycle contractions, delete a word, add a suffix, add your Q&A really quickly, just all kinds of things.
00:09:13.677 --> 00:09:17.408
But that keyboard is really customized for court reporters and what they will need.
00:09:17.408 --> 00:09:33.466
Our students get a customized shortcut keyboard for scoping, you know, because the kind of changes that we need to make aren't the kinds of changes that a court reporter makes, because we're typically working with multiple court reporters, so the changes we make are pretty repetitive.
00:09:33.466 --> 00:09:39.948
So the commands that we have have been developed over, I mean at least the course I would say.
00:09:39.948 --> 00:09:51.438
It took me about eight or nine years to develop like what a Scopus keyboard should actually have on it and be, and everyone in my scoping and proofing agency uses it.
00:09:51.438 --> 00:10:04.815
And it makes us really neat Scopus that we don't have and make errors that just happen because we press the wrong thing sometimes and it keeps us consistent in the way that we edit.
00:10:05.225 --> 00:10:17.437
When you talk about these things, it's like I know that there are so many tools that exist for us to do our work faster, yeah, and it's like a whole sea of overwhelming, like things that I just don't even want to.
00:10:17.437 --> 00:10:26.596
It's overwhelming because I know that it could be useful and could save so much time, but that it would take so much time to learn all those things.
00:10:26.804 --> 00:10:31.187
Yeah, and that's why I like coaching, because when I work with somebody, that's what I'm doing.
00:10:31.187 --> 00:10:35.046
I'm working with a working person that doesn't have time to figure those things out.
00:10:35.046 --> 00:10:37.009
I am a little bit of a nerd.
00:10:37.009 --> 00:10:43.717
I like coding and popping the proverbial hood on the cat four systems that we use.
00:10:43.717 --> 00:10:51.525
That's why I can use Eclipse and Case Catalyst pretty interchangeably, because my keyboard map is almost identical on both systems.
00:10:51.767 --> 00:10:55.312
So I don't really have to learn another software.
00:10:55.312 --> 00:10:57.015
I just plug my keyboard in there.
00:10:57.015 --> 00:11:07.114
It allows me to help out my Eclipse court reporters that literally were begging for us to go over to Eclipse and I said I can't go to Eclipse unless my keyboard can come with me.
00:11:07.114 --> 00:11:11.187
So I figured out how to get my keyboard, so now I'm good.
00:11:12.250 --> 00:11:14.315
Wow, you seem like really tech savvy.
00:11:14.315 --> 00:11:15.918
Yeah, I love it.
00:11:16.480 --> 00:11:17.062
I love those.
00:11:17.062 --> 00:11:17.744
Those come at.
00:11:17.744 --> 00:11:22.614
Whatever takes me six to seven clicks to do, I'm trying to do it in one.
00:11:22.614 --> 00:11:32.607
There's just and I think that's that's where ADHD serves me, because some people will say, like, if you want to do something, really well, find a lazy person to do it.
00:11:32.607 --> 00:11:45.095
If it takes me too many steps, I'm eliminating steps as much as I can, so I mean I wouldn't call that lazy, I don't know like innovative or something.
00:11:45.316 --> 00:11:46.398
Yeah, it's funny.
00:11:46.518 --> 00:11:52.746
Now I wouldn't call it lazy, you know, but my mom used to tell me when I was a kid, like why are you always taking the lazy man's load?
00:11:52.746 --> 00:11:56.452
I would hold like all the grocery bags at one time so I wouldn't have to go back out to the car.
00:11:56.452 --> 00:11:59.037
And now I understand why, but I didn't then.
00:11:59.037 --> 00:12:00.177
So yeah, totally it's.
00:12:00.219 --> 00:12:17.210
We're trying to eliminate steps, then they're going to feel more overwhelmed and things are good.
00:12:17.210 --> 00:12:22.145
But like if people really focus on how to do their role the fastest and the best and the most efficient, it's just like a win-win for everyone.
00:12:22.145 --> 00:12:22.668
I think yeah.
00:12:23.229 --> 00:12:29.753
I would say the best investment that a court reporter can make just like off the top of my head right now is to get software training.
00:12:29.753 --> 00:12:35.072
I don't care how long you've been on the software, get software training, because I need that definitely.
00:12:35.113 --> 00:12:36.154
But I just don't want to.
00:12:36.817 --> 00:12:39.027
Yes, I know, I know, but do it, like, just do it.
00:12:39.027 --> 00:12:44.889
Just do it Because, especially with case catalysts, because there's so many ways to do the same thing.
00:12:44.889 --> 00:12:59.033
That's why, let me say this, a lot of the reason this is just my personal opinion, so just bear with me A lot of the reason there are horror stories between scopists and court reporters and I find this to be true.
00:12:59.033 --> 00:13:11.918
I could be wrong, I'm sure someone will let us know is because the scopist and court reporter is on Case Catalyst, because there's so many ways to mess things up, because there's so many ways to do the same thing.
00:13:11.918 --> 00:13:17.196
So I'll take a simple example Like okay, how do you input your speakers when you're on the record and you have a?
00:13:17.196 --> 00:13:18.038
Like okay, how do you input your speakers when you're on the record?
00:13:18.038 --> 00:13:20.640
And like you have a speaker, how do you write your speakers?
00:13:20.880 --> 00:13:28.903
well, we have speaker designation, so certain strokes represent certain people and is that tied to the speaker list?
00:13:28.923 --> 00:13:30.167
the speaker pain for you?
00:13:30.167 --> 00:13:31.490
I don't even know what that means.
00:13:31.490 --> 00:13:40.706
So in case catalyst, there is a speaker list and I did a poll before I spoke at in Orlando and most court reporters don't.
00:13:40.706 --> 00:13:45.096
On case catalysts, don't use the speaker list, they either use a global.
00:13:45.096 --> 00:13:46.166
I guess I'm not using it.
00:13:46.166 --> 00:13:52.418
They have a stroke that's tied to the name, like in their global they'll have.
00:13:52.418 --> 00:13:55.831
Like, if they do left, they'll get Mr Brown or something like that.
00:13:56.071 --> 00:13:59.537
There are just so many different names that come up that I can't.
00:13:59.537 --> 00:14:08.105
I don't have a stroke for everyone's name, but later on when transcribing I would just global it whatever stroke I use to be their name.
00:14:08.827 --> 00:14:13.466
Exactly, but when the scopus comes behind you, they're not using steno to make that name.
00:14:13.466 --> 00:14:15.173
So the question is how are they doing it?
00:14:15.173 --> 00:14:30.870
The way they do it potentially creates havoc in the transcript, because now you've got to make sure that the way you globaled Mr McClendon and the way they decided to insert Mr McClendon if I'm just picking any name because of the CC issue is consistent.
00:14:31.152 --> 00:14:35.870
And that's probably another fear that court reporters have it is yeah, things can be so messed up easily.
00:14:36.613 --> 00:14:39.208
Yes, and and here's here's the answer.
00:14:39.208 --> 00:14:41.778
The answer is everybody used the speaker list.
00:14:41.778 --> 00:14:47.533
Even if a court reporter sends me a file and they're on case, I do not hand type speakers in.
00:14:47.533 --> 00:14:56.635
I do not make a global for the speaker, I only use the speaker list and we don't get that complaint ever.
00:14:56.916 --> 00:15:12.676
Like I said, a lot of what would help with software training is if you just said like can you just watch, like whoever the trainer might be, just like watch you do basic things for like 10 minutes and ask you some questions and show you the best way to do that on Case Catalyst.
00:15:12.725 --> 00:15:14.412
If you choose not to do it, so be it.
00:15:14.412 --> 00:15:18.015
But a lot of the horrors I haven't heard.
00:15:18.015 --> 00:15:42.686
If you just think back to some of the stories that you might see on social media about the scopus reporter relationship, when it is like bizarre it's because there's so many ways to edit or do a certain task or make a certain change and the scopist approach to doing that could give you hours of re-scoping time.
00:15:42.686 --> 00:15:46.096
When you get it back and then you're like totally freaked out.
00:15:46.096 --> 00:15:58.705
And the reason I'm saying case counts is because on eclipse there is one way to do it, like I I've probably worked with about maybe 60 eclipse court reporters at this time.
00:15:58.705 --> 00:16:00.369
They all use the speaker list.
00:16:00.369 --> 00:16:08.202
They don't use anything else, like the past seven minutes, and eclipse user would not understand what we're talking about If they've never.
00:16:08.243 --> 00:16:14.667
If they've never been on case cattle because there's only one way to do it, so it just adds more complexity, you know.
00:16:14.667 --> 00:16:17.933
And why is case cat so confusing?
00:16:17.933 --> 00:16:32.905
So I asked that question and I was told that it's because they're a mixture of some of the habits of other cat systems that they adopted over the years and when those users came on they still wanted to do something a certain way.
00:16:32.905 --> 00:16:37.447
And this is not to talk down on it, it's just in software it happens, you know, if you.
00:16:37.447 --> 00:16:39.567
If happens, let's say Notion, we love Notion, right.
00:16:39.567 --> 00:16:45.210
And then let's say Notion gets bought out and we're like wait a minute, why did you take this away?
00:16:45.210 --> 00:16:47.835
I love this feature, right.
00:16:47.835 --> 00:16:57.379
And then we talk to the developers and they're like, okay, let's give it back to them because we're going to lose a lot of our user base if we don't give them this thing that they really love.
00:16:58.245 --> 00:17:00.852
Well then what happens is when you have a new court reporter.
00:17:00.852 --> 00:17:12.155
Let's say you're the new court reporter, you go to court reporting school and maybe, if you don't get trained on case catalyst, your approach is just let me just kind of like get in here and get it done.
00:17:12.155 --> 00:17:16.291
But the way you approach getting it done now has five ways to do it.
00:17:16.291 --> 00:17:18.237
Which one are you going to pick?
00:17:18.237 --> 00:17:23.037
Whichever way you pick is pretty much what you're going to stick with for your whole career.
00:17:23.037 --> 00:17:29.035
Then, however, your scopus decides to edit or make changes or fix things.
00:17:29.035 --> 00:17:36.615
That's not a conversation that they're having, so it might look like the scopus just took leave of their senses.
00:17:36.615 --> 00:17:44.498
When you get the transcript back, and a lot of it goes back to how they made the changes in the first place.
00:17:44.498 --> 00:17:49.596
Are they deleting your steno or are they replacing it?
00:17:49.596 --> 00:17:51.508
Are they?
00:17:51.587 --> 00:17:53.454
so confusing and complicated.
00:17:54.047 --> 00:17:54.588
It's well.
00:17:54.588 --> 00:17:58.885
It's not complicated for me anymore because I know those specific issues.
00:17:58.885 --> 00:18:06.148
I know how so complicated scopus leave their sticky fingers all over a transcript and it's just about okay.
00:18:06.148 --> 00:18:08.738
Where did your sticky fingers go?
00:18:09.078 --> 00:18:22.101
Typically, the three main areas that they're going to mess up on depending on how they edit and depending on how the court reporter is doing things is going to be globaling, the speaker list and personal goals.
00:18:22.101 --> 00:18:33.796
Those three areas and the way they delete or the way they replace words that you had that approach by the time you figure that out, then it's not confusing anymore.
00:18:33.796 --> 00:18:35.907
You just have to have them stop doing that.
00:18:35.907 --> 00:18:52.789
So that's why I say for court reporters if you get, if you just have even just like a discovery call or just one one hour session, I'm pretty sure that you would learn that some of the things that you're doing are really time consuming and really layered and complex.
00:18:52.789 --> 00:19:07.409
And if you did it the actual way the developers meant for it to be done, or the feature that is best served to do that that way, you would reduce your stress.
00:19:08.211 --> 00:19:24.056
And I think one important thing to note that you said and made me realize something about how ineffective it was when I tried to get mentoring on the software and certain tricks and tips that are time-saving Like.
00:19:24.056 --> 00:19:31.965
I sat down with a coach one day in person this was before COVID as a mentoring session to teach me how to do certain things.
00:19:31.965 --> 00:19:40.518
But I think what would be better is for court reporters to know how to lead the session, even though they're not technically leading the session.
00:19:40.518 --> 00:20:04.776
There's an instructor that's helping, but if they know exactly how to get the most out of that session because I left my sessions feeling like I never used what he taught me If the court reporter sets it up so that the mentor or the teacher is watching them do certain things, then they know what to target, rather than just teaching you something completely new and unrelated to what you might have Exactly, exactly that.
00:20:04.816 --> 00:20:05.698
That was for me.
00:20:05.698 --> 00:20:07.688
That would be what I would do.
00:20:07.688 --> 00:20:17.476
I would watch me build my index, watch me edit five pages and start asking me why stuff is looking the way it's looking on my screen.
00:20:17.476 --> 00:20:19.969
You know what I mean, why I'm getting this result.
00:20:19.969 --> 00:20:24.465
Or when you do it, like once when I evaluate scopus, I do that for working scopus.
00:20:24.465 --> 00:20:26.729
They'll work with me and I'll just say, okay, let me watch your scope.
00:20:26.729 --> 00:20:29.372
And I'll just say, okay, let me watch your scope and I'll take notes as they're scoping.
00:20:29.732 --> 00:20:38.971
It's nerve wracking, but I was going to ask virtually yeah, yeah, on zoom, like I would just tell them to share their screen Right To me.
00:20:38.971 --> 00:20:41.778
And then I'm just, and they're sharing their audio.
00:20:41.778 --> 00:20:46.193
So I'm hearing the audio, I'm looking at the screen, I'm looking at how they're changing things and I'm like why'd you do that?
00:20:46.193 --> 00:20:51.045
You know, and I'll make notes and then they'll say, okay, that's okay.
00:20:51.045 --> 00:20:53.295
Or I'll ask the question how did you get that?
00:20:53.295 --> 00:20:54.480
How did you get that over there?
00:20:54.480 --> 00:20:56.386
Why did you decide to do it like that?
00:20:57.190 --> 00:21:00.226
And they'll of course say well, I don't know that's the way I always did it.
00:21:00.266 --> 00:21:02.568
Okay, well, let's try this, see if you like that better.
00:21:02.568 --> 00:21:05.251
And then we're like whoa, I didn't even know you could do that.
00:21:05.251 --> 00:21:07.755
Like the prefix and suffix box, that's a huge one.
00:21:07.755 --> 00:21:13.181
The reason that the Cat4KBD is really helpful is that it allows you to edit left to right instead of right to left.
00:21:13.181 --> 00:21:17.996
And if you think about that out loud, we normally edit right to left.
00:21:20.645 --> 00:21:31.500
If you're like on Google Docs or Microsoft Word, you're going to put your cursor to the right of the word and then backspace in or move your arrows into the word and then backspace, make the change like that.
00:21:31.500 --> 00:21:36.527
You know you go right to left, but when you're using a shortcut keyboard it allows you to edit left to right.
00:21:36.527 --> 00:21:41.705
So let's say the word is party and it needs to be parties, and my cursor is flashing on the letter P.
00:21:41.705 --> 00:21:46.712
I'm going to press one letter, which for me is W, and it's going to open my suffix box.
00:21:46.712 --> 00:21:48.954
And that suffix box is open.
00:21:48.954 --> 00:21:50.396
All I'm going to do is press S.
00:21:50.396 --> 00:21:57.692
From there it's going to delete the Y, add an IES and put my cursor on the word to the right.
00:21:59.195 --> 00:22:04.794
What, oh my gosh, that one thing right there because I mean, is that?
00:22:04.794 --> 00:22:06.196
I mean that's what we do all day is change stuff.
00:22:06.196 --> 00:22:12.125
Like that's a huge part of editing, so I don't have to stop the audio for that.
00:22:12.125 --> 00:22:19.218
So my goal whenever I'm working with a scope or even a court reporter that edits their own work, is I don't want you to stop the audio, if at all possible.
00:22:19.218 --> 00:22:20.584
Yeah, you know what I mean.
00:22:20.584 --> 00:22:22.328
Like that, that's the goal for your speed right?
00:22:22.630 --> 00:22:33.857
well, yeah, because they say it takes double the amount of time to scope if you're doing scoping to full audio, but if you can do it in the exact same amount of time as the proceeding, then that saves half the amount of time.
00:22:34.178 --> 00:22:41.917
Yeah, I can normally take someone who can scope 10 pages an hour to 20 pages an hour within about two weeks, two weeks.
00:22:41.917 --> 00:22:50.339
So yeah or less it's like of time, like if I work with them for about two weeks, that's like about three or four sessions, maybe less.
00:22:50.339 --> 00:22:56.076
If they scoped 10 pages per hour, they'll be scoping 20 pages per hour.
00:22:56.817 --> 00:22:57.178
Wow.
00:22:57.178 --> 00:23:01.234
Well, that's really going to be worth their money to invest in a coach like you.
00:23:02.136 --> 00:23:07.645
Yeah, that, and you know it was Brenda counts who said it before on a podcast that she likes to.
00:23:07.645 --> 00:23:16.355
If she's not scoping 40 pages an hour, there's something wrong with the way she was writing wow, 40, yeah, and I love that she said that.
00:23:16.434 --> 00:23:16.935
I love that.
00:23:16.935 --> 00:23:27.594
She said that because we think the way we think of time as court reporters and scope is when it comes to editing is more like I'm just gonna sit here until it's done do you know what I mean?
00:23:27.594 --> 00:23:38.527
Like there's it's, you know it can be, you can say, okay, by one o'clock I want to be here, but then when that doesn't happen, it's like all right, well, let me start all over again with this goal, you know, and let me just try to reach this section or this page or this, this target.
00:23:38.527 --> 00:23:53.618
But if you know, this is my average scoping pages per hour, editing pages per hour then you'll be able to quickly see or start asking yourself okay, what's the problem, what's happening, you know did I drop.
00:23:53.659 --> 00:23:54.819
Is the audio not clear?
00:23:54.819 --> 00:23:57.642
Um like, what types of changes did I make?
00:23:57.642 --> 00:23:59.913
And I can't sit still for an hour.
00:23:59.913 --> 00:24:02.785
So the way that I hack this is I set a five minute timer.
00:24:02.785 --> 00:24:10.796
Set a five minute timer and I scope to full audio whatever pages I complete in that five minutes.
00:24:10.796 --> 00:24:14.221
It could be a half a page, a full page, two pages, whatever it is.
00:24:14.221 --> 00:24:16.529
I multiply that by 12.